Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision
Previous revision
261:metamodelstrategy [2026/04/15 00:53] – created Meier, Erich261:metamodelstrategy [2026/04/15 01:03] (current) Meier, Erich
Line 3: Line 3:
 With the goal of supporting new process modeling best practices faster than before, while still keeping the number of metamodel variants low, we will support two standard metamodels going forward. With the goal of supporting new process modeling best practices faster than before, while still keeping the number of metamodel variants low, we will support two standard metamodels going forward.
  
-====== Unified Configuration Best Practice ======+This new strategy will be implemented with the **next Stages release 26.2**. We share this strategy already with this release to enable our customers to adjust accordingly in a timely manner. 
 + 
 +===== Unified Configuration Best Practice =====
  
 The **Unified Configuration Best Practice** will represent a clearly structured and consistent version of the Unified Configuration that reflects our best methodological recommendations for process modeling. The **Unified Configuration Best Practice** will represent a clearly structured and consistent version of the Unified Configuration that reflects our best methodological recommendations for process modeling.
Line 24: Line 26:
  
 Please discuss further details with your Product Consultant. Please discuss further details with your Product Consultant.
 +
 +===== What we will already deliver with this release =====
 +
 +With **Stages 26.1**, a first version of the **Unified Configuration Best Practice** is being provided.
 +
 +==== Changes compared to Unified Configuration 3 ====
 +
 +  * To better support the modeling and tailoring of different process lifecycles, **Quality Levels will be modeled at milestones** instead of at work products.
 +  * The **Responsible association between Workflow and Role** will no longer be available, ensuring a more consistent and unambiguous process modeling. Instead, the **Accountable** association should be used.
 +  * Comments on the input/output relationships between activities and work products are no longer converted into work product states, but are displayed as normal comments.
 +
 +This metamodel can be used for productive process modelling and will be the foundation for process frameworks distributed by the Stages team, e.g. the **[[https://www.ul.com/sis/stages/stages-automotive-process-framework|Automotive Process Framework]]**.
 +
 +For existing processes modeled with Unified Configuration 2 or 3, a migration will be required.
 +
 +Manual migration is already possible; automated migration support is planned for one of the next releases.