Stages Documentation

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
73:compliance [2019/04/04 10:07] – emr73:compliance [2019/04/04 11:20] – fnpk
Line 38: Line 38:
 To finish the mapping, use the X in the top right corner that shows both the reference model name and the name of the workspace where the process resides. To finish the mapping, use the X in the top right corner that shows both the reference model name and the name of the workspace where the process resides.
  
-{{ youtube>j5qlrl1jCUk?large }}+{{ youtube>j5qlrl1jCUk?large&rel=0 }}
  
 The above video shows the whole sequence of actions to assign reference model scopes, map the process to the individual requirements, and finally rate the mappings. The above video shows the whole sequence of actions to assign reference model scopes, map the process to the individual requirements, and finally rate the mappings.
Line 70: Line 70:
 ===== Generate Evidence ===== ===== Generate Evidence =====
  
-To generate the evidence for audits, assessments, or appraisals, the same report can be used. Simply run the report in the workspace containing the project's valid process. If a compliance requirement is mapped to a work product with files, those are included in the ''Evidence'' column.+To generate the evidence for audits, assessments, or appraisals, the same report can be used. Simply run the report in the workspace containing the project's valid process. If a compliance requirement is mapped to a work product with files, those are included in the ''Evidence''  column.
  
 The report results can be imported into common appraisal tools like //Appraisal Wizard//  and //Capability Advisor//, so auditors can start their assessment right away. The report results can be imported into common appraisal tools like //Appraisal Wizard//  and //Capability Advisor//, so auditors can start their assessment right away.